Skip to main content

Minding the new rules of summer internships




The summer months are almost here and, with them, the prospect of many employers offering unpaid internships to high school and college students. If your organization is considering such a move, tread carefully. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), if an intern is determined to actually be an employee, the employer must pay him or her at least minimum wage, plus overtime to the extent applicable. Fortunately, new rules introduced earlier this year make it a little easier to establish unpaid intern status.

How it used to be

Previously, an arrangement had to pass a six-factor U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) test to qualify as an unpaid internship:

1. The work must have been performed as an extension of a trade studied by the intern or be akin to his or her school training.
2. The work must have been for the intern’s benefit.
3. The intern couldn’t have replaced regular employees but rather must have worked under their close observation.
4. The employer must have derived no immediate advantage from the internship; the internship must have been primarily an educational experience for the intern.
5. The employer must not have promised the intern employment after the internship.
6. The employer and the intern must have mutually understood that the internship was unpaid.

Employers had to meet all six of these factors. But courts found the rules problematic — especially the “no immediate advantage” factor.

Today’s seven-factor test

In January 2018, the DOL introduced a new seven-factor test based largely on various U.S. federal appeals court decisions in FLSA cases. The new test seeks to establish the “economic reality” of the employer-intern relationship and identify which party is the “primary beneficiary.” As expressed by the DOL, the factors assess the extent to which:

1. The intern and employer clearly understand that there’s no expectation of compensation; any promise of compensation, express or implied, suggests that the intern is an employee (and vice versa),
2. The internship provides training similar to that which would be given in an educational environment, including the clinical and other hands-on training provided by educational institutions,
3. The internship is tied to the intern’s formal education program by integrated coursework or the receipt of academic credit,
4. The internship accommodates the intern’s academic commitments by corresponding to the academic calendar,
5. The internship’s duration is limited to the period in which the internship provides the intern with beneficial learning,
6. The intern’s work complements, rather than displaces, the work of paid employees while providing significant educational benefits to the intern, and
7. The intern and the employer understand that the internship is conducted without entitlement to a paid job at the internship’s conclusion.

In short, the intern must be the primary beneficiary of the relationship. Significantly, unlike the previous six-factor test, this one is flexible; no single factor is determinative.

Totally worth it

For employers, internships may seem like more trouble than they’re worth. But these arrangements can greatly benefit the students involved, provide energetic help with short-term projects, and improve your reputation in the employment market. Please contact us for more information.

© 2018

Popular posts from this blog

Is now the time to start offering paid parental leave?

Paid parental leave isn’t required under federal law. This means the United States is among only a few developed nations without a mandate for employers to offer compensated time off to mothers and fathers following the birth or adoption of a child. (Some states do have laws on the books.) Prevailing public opinion and the recent moves of some large employers, however, indicate a rising interest in this benefit.

For example, 82% of respondents to a 2017 Pew Research Center poll said mothers should receive paid leave following the birth or adoption of a child. (Sixty-nine percent said the same of fathers.) Meanwhile, mega-employer Walmart just launched an expanded parental leave policy this year. It features 10 paid weeks off for birth mothers and six weeks for other new parents, applicable to both hourly and salaried workers.

Potential advantages for employers

Is now the time for your organization to offer paid parental leave? Although it helps employees, of course, parental leave can al…

Behavioral job interviews offer a glimpse of what could be

Once an employer identifies a prospect for an open position and sets up an interview, another great challenge arises: How do you effectively use the interview to determine whether this person is right for your organization?

One way is behavioral interviewing — a technique in which you frame your questions to candidates to elicit real-world stories from previous work experience. The answers your interviewees give can offer a glimpse of what could be.

Examples to consider

It’s important to structure your questions so that the candidate can’t reply with only a “yes” or “no” answer. In some cases, your “questions” might not literally be questions.

For example, if you’re looking for a customer service rep, you could say, “Tell me about a time you’ve had to handle a dissatisfied customer.” Look for detailed responses that appear honest and heartfelt.

Or let’s say the open position is for a manager or executive. You might ask something along the lines of, “Talk about a situation in which you wer…

Assessing the S corp

The S corporation business structure offers many advantages, including limited liability for owners and no double taxation (at least at the federal level). But not all businesses are eligible - and, with the new 21% flat income tax rate that now applies to C corporations, S corps may not be quite as attractive as they once were.

Tax comparison

The primary reason for electing S status is the combination of the limited liability of a corporation and the ability to pass corporate income, losses, deductions and credits through to shareholders. In other words, S corps generally avoid double taxation of corporate income — once at the corporate level and again when distributed to the shareholder. Instead, S corp tax items pass through to the shareholders’ personal returns and the shareholders pay tax at their individual income tax rates.

But now that the C corp rate is only 21% and the top rate on qualified dividends remains at 20%, while the top individual rate is 37%, double taxation might b…